Antenna Resonance Simulator: Short, Long or Just Right?

This interactive antenna resonance simulator helps you understand how antenna length, frequency, velocity factor and antenna type affect resonance and estimated SWR. Select a common amateur radio band, choose a dipole, quarter-wave vertical, end-fed half-wave or full-wave loop antenna, then adjust the physical radiator length and watch the result change in real time. The tool is designed for radio amateurs, SDR users, RF hobbyists and anyone learning the basics of antenna tuning. It does not replace an antenna analyzer, VNA or real field measurement, but it provides a clear visual explanation of why antennas must be cut, trimmed and adjusted for the target frequency, selected material and installation conditions.

What this antenna resonance simulator does

An antenna may look like a simple piece of wire, metal tube or loop, but electrically it is a frequency-dependent RF structure. Its length, shape, height, surrounding environment and construction material all influence how efficiently it accepts radio-frequency energy. This interactive antenna resonance simulator is designed to make that relationship easier to understand. Instead of only reading formulas or looking at static antenna charts, you can select a band, choose an antenna type, change the physical radiator length and immediately see how the estimated resonance and SWR respond.

The simulator focuses on one of the most important ideas in practical antenna work: an antenna has to be electrically close to the right length for the frequency being used. A radiator that is too short behaves differently from one that is too long. In a real installation this difference appears as reactance, mismatch, higher SWR and reduced power transfer from the transmitter into the antenna system. The exact behavior depends on many real-world factors, but the basic principle is always the same: frequency and physical length are tightly linked.

This tool is aimed at radio amateurs, SDR users, RF hobbyists, electronics learners and anyone who wants a visual explanation of antenna length, velocity factor and standing wave ratio. It is not a replacement for an antenna analyzer, a vector network analyzer or real field measurement. Instead, it is a browser-based learning aid that helps explain why a half-wave dipole, quarter-wave vertical, end-fed half-wave antenna or full-wave loop must be designed and adjusted for the intended operating frequency.

Why antenna resonance matters

In radio communication, resonance is the condition where an antenna is electrically suited to the frequency being used. At or near resonance, the antenna can accept RF energy more efficiently because its reactive component is reduced. In practical terms, this usually means the antenna presents a more manageable impedance to the transmitter or matching network, and less energy is reflected back toward the source.

A resonant antenna is not automatically a perfect antenna. It can still be inefficient if it is too low, poorly installed, affected by lossy ground, built from unsuitable materials or coupled to nearby metal objects. However, resonance is one of the first things a radio operator usually checks because it tells us whether the antenna is fundamentally in the right electrical range.

When an antenna is far from resonance, the system may show high SWR. A high SWR does not always mean that no radiation occurs, and a low SWR does not always mean the antenna is efficient. This is an important distinction. A dummy load can have an excellent SWR while radiating almost nothing. A compromised antenna can show a tolerable SWR while wasting a large part of the energy as heat. Still, for basic antenna setup, SWR is a useful warning sign because it indicates how well the transmitter side is matched to the antenna system.

The simulator uses this idea in a simplified way. When the selected radiator length is close to the calculated resonant length for the chosen frequency, antenna type and velocity factor, the estimated SWR improves. When the radiator becomes too short or too long, the estimated mismatch increases. This is not a full electromagnetic model, but it gives a useful visual representation of what happens during antenna trimming.

Frequency and wavelength

The most important relationship behind antenna design is the link between frequency and wavelength. Radio waves travel at approximately the speed of light in free space. The higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength. The lower the frequency, the longer the wavelength.

This is why antennas for HF bands are physically large compared with antennas for VHF and UHF. A half-wave dipole for the 40 meter band is many meters long, while a quarter-wave vertical for the 2 meter band can be short enough to fit on a handheld radio, vehicle antenna mount or small base station installation.

The general idea is simple. If you know the frequency, you can estimate the wavelength. From that wavelength, you can calculate a quarter-wave, half-wave or full-wave radiator. For example, a half-wave dipole uses a total radiator length close to one half of the wavelength, split into two arms. A quarter-wave vertical uses a radiator close to one quarter of the wavelength, usually working against radials, a ground plane or a counterpoise system. A full-wave loop uses a conductor length close to one full wavelength.

The simulator automatically applies these basic relationships. When you select a band, it calculates the approximate resonant physical length for the selected antenna type. When you change the antenna type, the target electrical length also changes. This makes it easier to compare why a 20 meter dipole, a 20 meter vertical and a 20 meter loop require different physical dimensions.

Why antenna length changes with band

Amateur radio bands cover a very wide frequency range. On HF, the wavelength can be tens or even hundreds of meters. On VHF and UHF, the wavelength becomes much shorter. This is why the same antenna type changes size dramatically from one band to another.

A half-wave dipole for 80 meters is physically large and usually difficult to install in a small garden. A 20 meter dipole is far more manageable. A 2 meter dipole is small enough to mount indoors, in an attic or on a portable support. A 70 cm antenna can be very compact.

This scaling is one of the most practical lessons in antenna design. The antenna does not care what band name we use. It responds to wavelength. The terms 40 m, 20 m, 2 m or 70 cm are convenient labels, but the actual frequency determines the electrical size. Even within the same band, moving from the lower part to the upper part slightly changes the ideal resonant length.

In real antenna building, this is why antennas are often cut a little long and then trimmed. If the antenna is too long, its resonant point is usually too low in frequency. If it is too short, its resonant point is usually too high. Trimming removes small amounts of material until the desired resonance is reached. The simulator represents this by showing whether the radiator is too short, too long or close to the calculated resonant point.

What velocity factor means

Velocity factor is one of the most misunderstood details in practical antenna work. In free space, a radio wave travels at the speed of light. In a real conductor, insulated wire, coaxial cable or transmission line structure, electromagnetic energy travels more slowly. The ratio between the actual propagation speed and the speed of light is called the velocity factor.

A velocity factor of 1.00 would mean the wave travels at the speed of light. A velocity factor of 0.95 means it travels at 95 percent of that speed. A velocity factor of 0.66 means it travels at 66 percent of that speed. Lower velocity factor means the same electrical length is reached with a shorter physical length.

This matters when the radiator itself is influenced by insulation, surrounding dielectric material or coaxial construction. Bare wire often behaves closer to free-space assumptions, while insulated wire can require a shorter physical length than the same antenna made from bare wire. Coaxial cable used as part of a radiating structure can have an even lower velocity factor, depending on the dielectric.

The simulator includes selectable radiator materials and velocity factors to demonstrate this effect. When you choose a lower velocity factor, the calculated physical length becomes shorter. The electrical length may still be correct, but the actual measured length in meters is reduced. This is why two antennas designed for the same frequency and the same electrical length can have different physical dimensions.

Dipole antenna behavior

The half-wave dipole is one of the most important reference antennas in radio. It consists of two conductive arms fed at the center. The total length is close to one half of a wavelength, so each side is approximately one quarter wavelength long. This simple geometry makes the dipole a useful starting point for understanding resonance, current distribution and antenna trimming.

A dipole is usually resonant when its total electrical length is close to half a wavelength. If the dipole is too long, the resonant frequency shifts downward. If it is too short, the resonant frequency shifts upward. In practice, antenna builders often start with slightly longer wires and shorten them gradually while watching the resonant frequency or SWR curve.

Height above ground strongly affects a dipole. A low dipole can have a different feedpoint impedance, radiation angle and bandwidth compared with a higher dipole. Nearby roofs, gutters, metal masts, trees and walls can also shift resonance. This is why the calculated length is only a starting point. The final installed antenna often needs adjustment.

In the simulator, the dipole appears as two symmetrical arms with a center feed point. This is intentional because it visually matches the common physical structure of a half-wave dipole. As the length slider changes, both arms effectively become shorter or longer, and the estimated SWR moves accordingly.

Quarter-wave vertical antenna behavior

A quarter-wave vertical uses a vertical radiator close to one quarter wavelength long. Unlike a dipole, it usually needs a return path. This return path can be a radial system, a ground plane, vehicle body, metal roof, counterpoise or other conductive structure. Without a suitable return path, the antenna may still show some kind of match, but efficiency and radiation behavior can be poor.

This is why a vertical antenna is not just “one wire standing upright.” The missing half of the system is often the ground or radial network. On HF, radial quality can have a major effect on performance. On VHF and UHF, ground plane antennas often use visible radial rods below the vertical element. On handheld radios, the user’s body and radio chassis can become part of the counterpoise system.

The quarter-wave vertical is popular because it is compact compared with a half-wave dipole. It can provide useful low-angle radiation, which is valuable for many types of long-distance communication. However, the practical result depends heavily on ground losses, radial design and installation height.

In the simulator, the vertical is shown as a single upright radiator with a radial system. This avoids the visual confusion of showing it like a dipole. The main point is that the resonant part is the vertical radiator, while the radials represent the return system that allows the antenna to work properly.

End-fed half-wave antenna behavior

The end-fed half-wave antenna, often shortened to EFHW, is popular among portable radio operators, QRP enthusiasts and stations where center feeding a dipole is inconvenient. Instead of being fed in the center like a dipole, it is fed at or near one end of a half-wave radiator. Because the feedpoint impedance is high, an EFHW usually requires an impedance transformer, commonly a 49:1 or 64:1 transformer, depending on design and installation.

An EFHW should not be imagined as a three-wire antenna or as a normal dipole with the feedpoint moved slightly. Visually and practically, it is usually a long single wire connected to a transformer at one end. In many installations, a short counterpoise, the coax shield or common-mode path may influence behavior, but the primary radiator is the long wire.

This is why the simulator shows the EFHW as a single long wire leaving a small transformer box. That visual representation is much clearer than using the same two-arm dipole drawing for every antenna type. The key idea is that the wire length is close to a half wavelength on the target band, but the feedpoint conditions differ from a center-fed dipole.

Real EFHW antennas can be complex. The transformer quality, core material, winding ratio, installation height, wire slope, counterpoise and common-mode current control all affect the result. The simulator does not attempt to model all of that. It focuses on the basic electrical length concept: an EFHW radiator must still be close to the correct half-wave length for the intended frequency.

Full-wave loop antenna behavior

A full-wave loop uses a conductor length close to one full wavelength. It can be arranged as a square, triangle, rectangle, diamond or irregular shape, depending on installation constraints. Loops are widely used on HF and can offer useful performance, often with different noise and radiation characteristics compared with simple dipoles.

The feedpoint impedance of a full-wave loop is not the same as a half-wave dipole, and it can vary depending on shape, height and feedpoint location. Some loop antennas are fed with balanced line and used across multiple bands with a tuner. Others are built as single-band resonant loops.

The important idea for this simulator is that a full-wave loop has a total conductor length close to one wavelength. That makes it much longer than a half-wave dipole for the same frequency. On lower HF bands this can be physically demanding, while on higher bands it becomes easier to install.

The simulator shows the loop as a closed shape, not as two open wires. This is important because a loop is physically and electrically different from a dipole. As the length changes, the loop outline grows or shrinks, helping the user understand that the entire closed conductor is the relevant radiator length.

What SWR means

SWR stands for standing wave ratio. It is a measure of mismatch between a transmission line and the load connected to it. In an antenna system, the load is the antenna feedpoint impedance as seen through whatever feedline and matching components are present. When the impedance match is good, less energy is reflected. When the match is poor, more energy is reflected.

A perfect match would have an SWR of 1:1. In practical antenna systems, values below about 1.5:1 are often considered good. Values around 2:1 may still be usable in many cases, depending on the transmitter and system. Higher values may cause modern transmitters to reduce output power to protect their final amplifier stages.

However, SWR must be interpreted carefully. A low SWR does not prove that the antenna is radiating efficiently. It only says that the transmitter side sees a reasonably good match. Losses in coax, traps, loading coils or poor ground systems can make SWR look better than the actual radiation performance deserves. Conversely, an antenna with a higher SWR might still radiate well if matched properly with a suitable tuner and low-loss feed system.

This simulator uses SWR as a simplified indicator of how close the selected radiator length is to the calculated resonant length. When the length is close, the estimated SWR improves. When the radiator becomes too long or too short, the estimated SWR worsens.

If you want a deeper explanation of what SWR means in a real transmitting system, including reflected power, final transistor stress, dummy loads, coaxial cable losses and safe operating limits, read our full guide to SWR and protecting your radio finals.

Why SWR is only an estimate here

A browser-based antenna simulator cannot fully predict real antenna behavior with only band, antenna type, velocity factor and radiator length. Real antennas are three-dimensional electromagnetic structures. Their behavior depends on installation height, ground conductivity, nearby metal, wire diameter, insulation, feedline coupling, balun quality, radial layout and many other factors.

For example, a dipole installed low above ground can have a feedpoint impedance that differs significantly from a dipole installed higher. A vertical with poor radials may have high ground loss even if the SWR looks acceptable. An EFHW can show common-mode current on the feedline if it is not installed or choked properly. A loop can change behavior depending on whether it is square, triangular, vertical, horizontal or sloping.

Because of this, the SWR shown by the simulator should be understood as an educational estimate. It is based mainly on the relationship between calculated resonant length and selected physical length. It is useful for showing direction and concept, not for producing a final antenna cutting plan.

The correct workflow in real life is different. Use formulas and simulations as starting points, build the antenna slightly adjustable, measure it with an antenna analyzer or VNA, then trim or modify the installation based on real measurements.

Why the antenna can be too short or too long

When an antenna is too short for a frequency, it is usually electrically capacitive. When it is too long, it is usually electrically inductive. In both cases, the antenna is not purely resistive at the desired operating frequency. This reactive component contributes to mismatch and can shift the point of lowest SWR away from the intended frequency.

In practical terms, if the antenna resonates above your target frequency, it is often too short. If it resonates below your target frequency, it is often too long. This is a common diagnostic rule when trimming wire antennas. If your 20 meter dipole has its lowest SWR below the part of the band you want to use, you shorten it. If the lowest SWR is above your desired frequency, you lengthen it if possible.

The simulator reflects this behavior by displaying whether the radiator is too short or too long compared with the calculated resonant physical length. This makes it easier to understand what real antenna trimming is trying to accomplish.

Why VHF and UHF are more sensitive

At VHF and UHF, the wavelength is much shorter than on HF. This means that small physical length changes represent a larger fraction of a wavelength. A few millimeters may not matter much on 80 meters, but they can be significant on 70 cm. This is why antenna construction and measurement become more mechanically sensitive at higher frequencies.

Connector quality, feedpoint geometry, mounting bracket dimensions and nearby conductive objects also become more important as frequency increases. On UHF, even the physical layout of a short lead or connector transition can affect impedance. This is one reason why VHF and UHF antennas often require more careful construction than beginners expect.

The simulator demonstrates this indirectly. When you select 2 meters or 70 cm, the calculated resonant lengths become short. The length slider then operates over a much smaller physical range. This helps show why a handheld antenna, ground plane, Yagi element or small vertical must be built and trimmed with more precision at higher frequencies.

Why real antennas are usually trimmed

The calculated length of an antenna is a starting value, not a guaranteed final answer. Many antenna builders deliberately make wire antennas a little longer than the calculated value. Then they install the antenna in its real environment and trim it gradually.

This approach works because shortening a wire is easy, while lengthening it is more inconvenient. The antenna’s installed environment can shift resonance, so cutting it exactly to a formula before measurement may result in an antenna that ends up too short. Starting slightly long gives room for adjustment.

For a dipole, trimming usually means shortening both arms evenly. For a vertical, it may mean adjusting a telescopic whip, changing the top section or modifying loading. For an EFHW, it may mean trimming the far end of the wire. For a loop, it may mean changing the total circumference.

The simulator’s length slider is a simplified version of this trimming process. Moving the slider shorter or longer shows how resonance moves relative to the target band.

Why installation environment matters

An antenna installed in open space behaves differently from the same antenna installed near a roof, wall, tree, balcony railing, gutter, tower, attic wiring or metal fence. Nearby objects can add capacitance, absorb energy, detune the antenna or distort the radiation pattern.

Height above ground is especially important. A horizontal dipole close to the ground can have a high-angle radiation pattern and a feedpoint impedance different from the textbook value. A vertical with inadequate ground or radial system can lose substantial energy in the soil. An attic antenna may couple to electrical wiring, insulation foil, roof materials and metal structures.

This is why two people can build antennas from the same formula and get different measurements. The antenna is not operating in isolation. It is part of a complete electromagnetic environment.

The simulator intentionally keeps this complexity out of the interface. Its purpose is to make the core length-frequency relationship clear. Once that is understood, the real-world complications become easier to interpret.

Dipole, vertical, EFHW and loop compared

Each antenna type in the simulator represents a different practical approach to creating a resonant radiator.

The half-wave dipole is balanced, center-fed and conceptually clean. It is often the first serious antenna that radio amateurs study because it demonstrates wavelength, current distribution and resonance in a straightforward way. It needs two supports or an inverted-V arrangement, but it is efficient when installed well.

The quarter-wave vertical is physically shorter and can be convenient where horizontal space is limited. It needs a good ground or radial system. Its performance depends heavily on the quality of that return system. A vertical can be effective for low-angle radiation, but a poor radial system can waste energy.

The end-fed half-wave antenna is attractive because it can be fed from one end. This makes it convenient for portable operation and awkward installation sites. It normally requires a transformer and attention to common-mode current. It is not magic; it still follows the same electrical length rules as other half-wave radiators.

The full-wave loop uses a closed conductor approximately one wavelength long. It can be efficient and useful, especially where there is enough space to install it properly. It often behaves differently from a dipole and can have different noise and radiation characteristics.

The simulator does not try to say which antenna is best. Instead, it helps show that each antenna type has its own electrical length target and physical structure.

How to use the simulator effectively

Start by selecting a familiar amateur radio band, such as 20 meters or 40 meters. Choose a half-wave dipole first because it is the easiest antenna type to understand. Look at the calculated resonant physical length, then move the length slider shorter and longer. Watch how the estimated SWR and resonance error change.

Next, switch to a quarter-wave vertical on the same band. Notice that the calculated length is roughly half of the dipole’s total length because the vertical radiator is approximately a quarter wavelength. Then switch to an EFHW and observe that its radiator length is again close to a half wavelength. Finally, try the full-wave loop and see how much longer the total conductor becomes.

After that, change the velocity factor. Select bare wire, insulated wire and coax-style radiator options. The target frequency stays the same, but the calculated physical length changes. This demonstrates why material and construction affect practical antenna dimensions.

Then move to VHF and UHF bands. Select 2 meters or 70 cm and notice how short the antennas become. Small changes in length produce larger relative errors. This is a useful way to understand why precision matters more as frequency increases.

Common misunderstandings about antenna resonance

One common misunderstanding is that resonance alone guarantees good performance. It does not. A resonant antenna can still be inefficient if it has high loss. For example, a short loaded antenna may be resonant but still waste energy in loading coils or ground loss.

Another misunderstanding is that low SWR means the antenna is good. Low SWR only means the transmitter sees a match. It does not measure radiation efficiency, pattern quality or signal strength. A lossy system can hide mismatch by absorbing energy.

A third misunderstanding is that formulas always give final dimensions. Formula-based lengths are starting points. Real antennas must often be adjusted after installation.

A fourth misunderstanding is that an EFHW does not need any return path. In practice, end-fed antennas often interact with the feedline, transformer, counterpoise and surrounding environment. If common-mode current is not controlled, the feedline may become part of the radiating system.

A fifth misunderstanding is that all wire antennas of the same frequency are physically identical. Insulation, wire diameter, nearby objects and velocity factor can change the required length.

The simulator helps address these misunderstandings by showing the effect of frequency, antenna type and velocity factor separately.

Why this simulator is useful for beginners

For beginners, antenna theory can feel abstract. Terms such as wavelength, SWR, resonance, velocity factor and electrical length are often introduced separately, making it difficult to see how they connect. An interactive tool makes the relationship more visible.

When a beginner drags a length slider and sees the estimated SWR change, the concept becomes less theoretical. The user can experiment without cutting wire, climbing a mast or connecting a transmitter. This is especially useful before building a first antenna.

The simulator can also prevent a common mistake: assuming that any long wire is automatically good for any frequency. A wire may receive signals over a broad range, especially with an SDR, but transmitting efficiently requires more careful attention to resonance, impedance and matching.

For SDR users who only receive, the simulator is still useful because it explains why some antennas work better on certain bands and why physical size matters even when no transmitter is used.

Why this simulator is useful for experienced operators

Experienced radio operators already know that real antennas are more complicated than simple formulas. However, a visual simulator can still be useful as a teaching tool. It can help explain antenna basics to new operators, students, visitors or readers of a technical blog.

It is also useful for comparing antenna types quickly. Seeing a dipole, vertical, EFHW and loop side by side in concept helps clarify why each has different physical requirements. It reinforces the idea that antenna length is not arbitrary.

For content creators, the simulator adds interactive value to an RF article. Instead of presenting only text and tables, the page gives readers something to test. This can increase engagement and make technical explanations easier to remember.

Limitations of the model

This simulator is intentionally simplified. It does not model antenna impedance with full electromagnetic accuracy. It does not calculate radiation pattern, feedpoint resistance, ground loss, common-mode current, bandwidth, Q factor, polarization, height above ground or environmental detuning. It also does not simulate baluns, transformers, loading coils, traps or matching networks.

The estimated SWR should therefore not be used as a construction guarantee. A real antenna cut to the displayed length may still require adjustment. The simulator is best used for understanding trends: shorter versus longer, lower versus higher frequency, different velocity factors and different antenna types.

For real antenna design, use this tool as a conceptual guide, then verify the antenna with real measurements. An antenna analyzer or VNA can show the actual resonant frequency, impedance and SWR curve. Field testing can then confirm whether the antenna performs well in real communication conditions.

Practical antenna building workflow

A sensible real-world workflow starts with the target band and operating frequency. Decide where in the band you want the antenna to perform best. Then choose the antenna type based on space, height, supports, grounding options and operating goals.

Next, calculate a starting length. Account for velocity factor if the radiator material or construction requires it. Build the antenna slightly long when practical. Install it in the intended position because measuring it on the ground may produce misleading results.

Then measure the antenna with an analyzer. Look for the frequency where SWR is lowest, but also pay attention to impedance and reactance if your instrument provides that data. If the resonant point is too low, shorten the antenna. If it is too high, lengthen it if possible.

Repeat the process in small steps. On HF, small wire changes can shift resonance noticeably. On VHF and UHF, even smaller changes can matter. Once the antenna is close, secure the mechanical structure and check again because final mounting can slightly change the result.

The simulator mirrors this workflow conceptually, but without the real-world measurement step.

Why antenna articles benefit from interactive tools

Antenna theory is a strong topic for interactive content because it involves relationships that are easier to understand visually than through text alone. Frequency, wavelength, physical length and velocity factor are mathematical concepts, but they directly affect real objects. A reader can understand them faster when a diagram changes in real time.

This kind of simulator also fits naturally into a technology or RF blog. It is not just a casual game. It is an educational RF tool that supports articles about amateur radio, SDR, antenna design, VHF/UHF communication, portable operation and radio propagation.

A well-structured page can include a short introduction above the simulator and a detailed explanation below it. The simulator gives the page interactive value, while the explanation provides search engines and readers with enough context to understand the topic deeply.

Recommended internal linking context

This simulator can be internally linked from articles about amateur radio antennas, SDR reception, HF bands, VHF and UHF communication, SWR meters, antenna analyzers, coaxial cable, portable radio operation and end-fed antennas. The best anchor texts would include natural phrases such as interactive antenna resonance simulator, antenna length and SWR simulator, RF antenna resonance tool, or visual antenna tuning example.

In the opposite direction, the simulator page can link back to deeper explanatory articles. For example, if there is an article about dipole antennas, the simulator page can link to it from the dipole section. If there is a page about coaxial cable or velocity factor, it can be linked from the velocity factor explanation. If there is an SDR or amateur radio beginner guide, this simulator can support it as a practical visual exercise.

This creates a useful topical cluster instead of an isolated tool page. Search engines can better understand that the site covers RF and antenna topics in depth, while readers get a more coherent learning path.

Antenna resonance is one of the core ideas in RF communication. The correct radiator length depends on frequency, antenna type and velocity factor. A dipole, quarter-wave vertical, end-fed half-wave antenna and full-wave loop all follow wavelength-based principles, but they use different physical structures and different electrical length targets.

This interactive antenna resonance simulator helps visualize those relationships. By adjusting the band, antenna type, radiator material and physical length, users can see how a radiator becomes too short, too long or close to resonance. The estimated SWR provides a simplified indication of mismatch, while the changing graphic makes the antenna structure easier to understand.

The model is intentionally approximate. Real antennas must still be measured and adjusted in their actual environment. Ground conditions, height, nearby objects, feed systems, transformers, baluns and construction details all influence the final result. Even so, the simulator provides a useful starting point for understanding why antennas are cut, trimmed and tested rather than guessed.

Image(s) used in this article are either AI-generated or sourced from royalty-free platforms like Pixabay or Pexels.

This article may contain affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.